Re: [IPFIX] Export of long lived flow information
Brian Trammell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Another +1. Cheers, B On Oct 26, 2012, at 2:15 AM, Andrew Feren wrote: > +1 > I have tripped over that wording a few times in the past. The change from > Flow to Flow Record is an improvement. > > > -Andrew > > > On 10/25/12 6:56 PM, "Paul Aitken" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gerhard, >> >> If everyone's happy with this clarification, then we should ask IANA to >> update the descriptions in the IPFIX registry. >> >> P. >> >> >> On 25/10/12 19:26, Gerhard Muenz wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems that some Information Element descriptions need >>> clarification. For example, I think that the description of the >>> Information Elements flowStart* and flowEnd* should be clarified: >>> >>> OLD: >>> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet of this Flow. >>> NEW: >>> The absolute timestamp of the first|last packet accounted in this Flow >>> Record. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IPFIX mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix