Re: [IPFIX] Compliance Statement (Pete Resnick's DISCUSS)
Nevil Brownlee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Selection Tech authors:
We really do have to get back to Pete with a clear consensus on this.
From the few replies to my posting to the list on this, my proposal
on the consensus so far is to replace the sentence in section 6.1 as
follows:
OLD: In order to be compliant with this document, at least the
Property Match Filtering SHOULD be implemented.
NEW: In order to be compliant with IPFIX, at least one of
this document's flow filtering schemes MUST be implemented.
This would make it mirror the compliance statement in RFC 5475 (PSAMP
packet selection.
So now, please email the list to say "yes, the proposed NEW above
is OK," or to suggest something better.
Cheers, Nevil
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department
Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland
FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix