Re: [IPFIX] Compliance Statement (Pete Resnick's DISCUSS)

The new proposed text is IMO better.

Cheers, Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 28.05.2013, at 00:18, Nevil Brownlee <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Hi Selection Tech authors:
> 
> We really do have to get back to Pete with a clear consensus on this.
> 
> From the few replies to my posting to the list on this, my proposal
> on the consensus so far is to replace the sentence in section 6.1 as
> follows:
> 
> OLD:  In order to be compliant with this document, at least the
>      Property Match Filtering SHOULD be implemented.
> 
> NEW:  In order to be compliant with IPFIX, at least one of
>      this document's flow filtering schemes MUST be implemented.
> 
> This would make it mirror the compliance statement in RFC 5475 (PSAMP
> packet selection.
> 
> So now, please email the list to say "yes, the proposed NEW above
> is OK," or to suggest something better.
> 
> Cheers, Nevil
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Nevil Brownlee                          Computer Science Department
> Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941             The University of Auckland
> FAX: +64 9 373 7453   Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix