Re: [IPFIX] AD review: draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-03

Brian Trammell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipfix
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hi Benoit,

Thanks; comments inline...

On 7 Oct 2013, at 14:24 , Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I accepted to AD sponsor this document.
> 
> Here is my review.
> 
> Do we need to say "update RFC 5102"? Not sure myself.
> On one side, we update an IE specified in RFC 5102
> On the other side, RFC 7012 says that the registry is THE reference.

Given that, there's no need to update 5102; I've changed the abstract to make this a bit more clear:

This document revises the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element as originally defined in 
[RFC5102] to reflect changes to the TCP Flags header field since [RFC0793].
                                                                   ^^
      added "as originally defined" to make it clear that 5102 is the source, not the authority.

The change does replace revision 0 of the IE in the registry with revision 1; I'll change the IANA Considerations section to make this more explicit, too.

> Personally, I would have gone with the update path.
> Anyway, not a blocking factor to progress the document. I will check with IANA.
> 
> OLD:
> 
>    IANA will update the definition of the tcpControlBits Information
>   Element in the the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry
>   [IANA-IPFIX] to reflect the changes in Section 2 above.
> 
> NEW:
> 
>   IANA updates the definition of the tcpControlBits Information
>   Element in the the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry
>   [IANA-IPFIX] to reflect the changes in Section 2 above.

Changed to past-tense instead.

> 
> There are a couple of nits, specifically because RFC 7011, 7012, 7013 have been published.

Fixed the references.

> Please post a new version, and I'll progress the document.

Will do shortly.

Cheers,

Brian

_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 496 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSUs5SAAoJENt3nsOmbNJcIOoIAM2jamjHfDr1B/07iUdgfNeR
J1+qRMhct9bZ7cfC6HCWOfyrjwoKVubBAsiJuMRl47vPfj6fBiYkenqKFQLcW+y4
Ylo/BpG76cyyqwAtwlHxoeoC0nZ3EPKjauTu5w+cGkQvDQslUzVJtTFDp9CEGXxC
k58weIL83vD3SSe9yWxdhjuROXZYhNU8h0FKyG1KolzvMAShAwvydZJxRJlWZrLP
OCdpYwKBPHM8TvHw8yNOQX6UEb7DlJQl9q7kyouPMPoOOpps1QZP6wNX3fjR9Sh7
5gyjwk+iQDkSP005mgVkljN441cbm1LzfrFRoYbMBvGyP2/9Rf1dBOYxJclU0c8=
=i+vH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.