Re: [IPFIX] AD review: draft-trammell-ipfix-tcpcontrolbits-revision-03
Brian Trammell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi Benoit, Thanks; comments inline... On 7 Oct 2013, at 14:24 , Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I accepted to AD sponsor this document. > > Here is my review. > > Do we need to say "update RFC 5102"? Not sure myself. > On one side, we update an IE specified in RFC 5102 > On the other side, RFC 7012 says that the registry is THE reference. Given that, there's no need to update 5102; I've changed the abstract to make this a bit more clear: This document revises the tcpControlBits IPFIX Information Element as originally defined in [RFC5102] to reflect changes to the TCP Flags header field since [RFC0793]. ^^ added "as originally defined" to make it clear that 5102 is the source, not the authority. The change does replace revision 0 of the IE in the registry with revision 1; I'll change the IANA Considerations section to make this more explicit, too. > Personally, I would have gone with the update path. > Anyway, not a blocking factor to progress the document. I will check with IANA. > > OLD: > > IANA will update the definition of the tcpControlBits Information > Element in the the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry > [IANA-IPFIX] to reflect the changes in Section 2 above. > > NEW: > > IANA updates the definition of the tcpControlBits Information > Element in the the IANA IPFIX Information Element Registry > [IANA-IPFIX] to reflect the changes in Section 2 above. Changed to past-tense instead. > > There are a couple of nits, specifically because RFC 7011, 7012, 7013 have been published. Fixed the references. > Please post a new version, and I'll progress the document. Will do shortly. Cheers, Brian _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 496 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSUs5SAAoJENt3nsOmbNJcIOoIAM2jamjHfDr1B/07iUdgfNeR J1+qRMhct9bZ7cfC6HCWOfyrjwoKVubBAsiJuMRl47vPfj6fBiYkenqKFQLcW+y4 Ylo/BpG76cyyqwAtwlHxoeoC0nZ3EPKjauTu5w+cGkQvDQslUzVJtTFDp9CEGXxC k58weIL83vD3SSe9yWxdhjuROXZYhNU8h0FKyG1KolzvMAShAwvydZJxRJlWZrLP OCdpYwKBPHM8TvHw8yNOQX6UEb7DlJQl9q7kyouPMPoOOpps1QZP6wNX3fjR9Sh7 5gyjwk+iQDkSP005mgVkljN441cbm1LzfrFRoYbMBvGyP2/9Rf1dBOYxJclU0c8= =i+vH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----