Re: [IPFIX] Review of draft-irtf-nmrg-location-ipfix-07.txt
Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:02:31 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipfix |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Collecting this data is not particularly difficult, but protecting the privacy is much harder and will, I imagine be subject to significant scrutiny as the draft progresses. It seems to me that there are security and privacy issues concerning both the traffic and the collector itself. The privacy of the user is a widely understood concept and will I am sure be thoroughly examined in review. In the case of the collector I am not convinced that it is wise to reveal the precise location of the network infrastructure since this could result in it being subject to physical attack. An approach that you do not seem to explore is encrypting the location record so that this can only be understood by those that are authorised to see it. Indeed there is a case for something analogous to the selective availability system in GPS whereby the location is provided with different degrees of precision depending on the authority of the user. - Stewart On 23/11/2016 02:33, Zhoutianran wrote: > Hi, > > Though IPFIX is concluded, could the IPFIX experts in this mailing list please help to provide comments for this I-D? > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nmrg-location-ipfix > > It seems this work has a long history. Your help will push this work a step forward. > > > Thanks, > Tianran > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix _______________________________________________ IPFIX mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix