Re: Re: [dhcwg] WG Last Call for DHCP draft

On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 13:32 -0700, Ted Lemon wrote:
> My personal preference on the second issue is the same as Ralph's: you 
> should just take out all the text about how to format the client 
> identifier and reference the draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-03.txt draft. 
>    If you want to have your text in there as well, I'm not going to 
> fight it really hard, but the right thing to do is definitely to 
> reference the 3315id-for-v4 draft.   I presume the motivation for not 
> referencing it is to avoid a dependency on that draft for finalizing 
> the infiniband draft?
> 
> 
[trimming some of the cc's so we will only get one copy each]

What is the timing on 3315id-for-v4 ?

I would hate to have a dependency on it and have to wait a year or so
for the dependency to clear.  However, if this is in last call (or very
close to it now) we can adjust accordingly.

So for this issue our choices seem to be
1) Leave it like it is - sub optimal, but not horrible
2) Reference 3315* and help push the draft out sooner
3) Remove text referring how to format the  client identifier

<WG Hat Off>
Wondering if the easiest thing to do is 3 ??? 

Comments Vivek ?
<WG Hat back On>

Lets figure out what the correct thing to do is and try to close this so
final draft can make it in by the Draft cutoff deadline and we can close
this in Mn.

Bill
co-chair IPoIB WG