Re: [Ipoverib] Re: WG Last Call for DHCP draft

On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Bill Strahm wrote:
> I would hate to have a dependency on it and have to wait a year or so
> for the dependency to clear.  However, if this is in last call (or very
> close to it now) we can adjust accordingly.
The draft is in last call, with a couple of significant comments which 
will require some changes, but the changes aren't severe - basically, 
there was some uncaught bad wording in the draft that a new reader 
noticed.

> So for this issue our choices seem to be
> 1) Leave it like it is - sub optimal, but not horrible
>
Can't live with this.

> 2) Reference 3315* and help push the draft out sooner
>
This would be great, and I don't _think_ it would create any 
significant delay.

> 3) Remove text referring how to format the  client identifier
>
This works for me, but I do prefer 2.

> Lets figure out what the correct thing to do is and try to close this 
> so
> final draft can make it in by the Draft cutoff deadline and we can 
> close
> this in Mn.

Agreed.