Re: Re: [dhcwg] WG Last Call for DHCP draft
Vivek Kashyap <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:49:35 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipoib,gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFF1FE5E6E.377BA47C-ON88256F96.0076E737-88256F96.007823BC@us.ibm.com> |
My personal preference on the second issue is the same as Ralph's: you should just take out all the text about how to format the client identifier and reference the draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-03.txt draft. <VK> I'm not sure if Ralph said that...in any case see below. If you go over IPoIB archives you will find the original discussion on the client-identifiers and the resultant draft. <VK> If you want to have your text in there as well, I'm not going to fight it really hard, but the right thing to do is definitely to reference the 3315id-for-v4 draft. I presume the motivation for not referencing it is to avoid a dependency on that draft for finalizing the infiniband draft? <VK> True..I'm not convinced that a reference to every draft that may become relevant has to be referred to .. if it was an RFC I'd immediately put a reference in. The dhcp over infiniband draft is not precluding any other use. <VK> _______________________________________________ IPoverIB mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib _______________________________________________ IPoverIB mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib