Re: Re: [dhcwg] WG Last Call for DHCP draft

Vivek Kashyap <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:49:35 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipoib,gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID <OFF1FE5E6E.377BA47C-ON88256F96.0076E737-88256F96.007823BC@us.ibm.com>
My personal preference on the second issue is the same as Ralph's: you 
should just take out all the text about how to format the client 
identifier and reference the draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-03.txt draft. 

<VK> I'm not sure if Ralph said that...in any case see below. If you go 
over IPoIB archives you will find  the original discussion on the 
client-identifiers and the resultant draft. 
<VK>

   If you want to have your text in there as well, I'm not going to 
fight it really hard, but the right thing to do is definitely to 
reference the 3315id-for-v4 draft.   I presume the motivation for not 
referencing it is to avoid a dependency on that draft for finalizing 
the infiniband draft?

<VK> True..I'm not convinced that a reference to every draft that may 
become relevant has to be referred to .. if it was an RFC I'd immediately 
put a reference in. The dhcp over infiniband draft is not precluding any 
other use.

<VK>




_______________________________________________
IPoverIB mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib

_______________________________________________
IPoverIB mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib