RE: Why is MTU an issue? (RE: Please read - proposed W G termination)
Vivek Kashyap <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipoib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
snip... >> >> The MTU problem is a n^2 problem but it is solved distributively... Each >> host decides which MTU to use for each one of the connections to the peers >> it has. In an N hosts fabric, each host may have (N-1) connections to >> peers. The MTU selection is trivial, it's the minimum between my local MTU >> and my peer MTU, negotiated at the time the connection is established. > > It should also be noted that one would not be limited to only one connection > pair since from a technology perspective, there is no reason why multiples > cannot be used for QoS purposes / bandwidth management purposes. The same > applies to the UD method though few people have implemented it as such. Yes, that is true. One may choose to create multiple connections between two peers. IPoIB-CM allows this. The implementation can then choose to negotiate the same MTU across all connections between the two peers. Vivek > > Mike