RE: Ecosystems cost of additional specs (RE: Please read - proposed WG termination)

I have also just updated the 6 IP Over IB MIB I-Ds and they are now on
the WG web page again. What needs to be done now to bring these to
publication?

/sean

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Vivek Kashyap
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:56 AM
To: H.K. Jerry Chu
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Ecosystems cost of additional specs (RE: [Ipoverib] Please
read - proposed WG termination)

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:

> ...
> <snip>
>
>> In any case, I think the debate has played itself out and the virtual
hum
>> says to proceed.
>
> Actually a similar debate and virtual hum already happened a couple of
> years ago, before the proposal was accepted as a work item for the WG.

There have been other, more recent, agreements/hums too. The connected
mode=20
draft became a working group draft late last year/early this year.

> So the debate in the past couple of weeks, although interesting and
may
> even be educational for the late comers, is mostly moot.

Wasn't the query whether the wg should continue and if there was
interest=20
in the specification? Why would that make the 'virtual hum' now moot?

>
> The decision facing the working group now is to either have enough
> people committed to reviewing and producing a high quality standard,
> or have the WG disbanded. We will have to decide soon.

I thought the discussion over the last few days was answering the
question
of WG continuance.  In any case, I'm committed to continuing to work on
the=20
draft and bringing it to publication.

Vivek


>
> Jerry
>
>> So, I'll go quiet unless someone has a specific issue or
>> wants to continue the debate for some other reason.  Mark me down as
not
>> supporting the hum which is likely just me in this regard.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib
>
>

_______________________________________________
IPoverIB mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib