RE: Ecosystems cost of additional specs (RE: Please re ad - proposed WG termination)

>
>
> ...
> <snip>
>
> >In any case, I think the debate has played itself out and the virtual
hum
> >says to proceed.
>
> Actually a similar debate and virtual hum already happened a couple of
> years ago, before the proposal was accepted as a work item for the WG.
> So the debate in the past couple of weeks, although interesting and may
> even be educational for the late comers, is mostly moot.
>
> The decision facing the working group now is to either have enough
> people committed to reviewing and producing a high quality standard,
> or have the WG disbanded. We will have to decide soon.

I think that there were quite a few people who spoke up over the past few
weeks, so it is a matter of finishing up the draft that Vivek sent out.
This is not a matter for working on a document from scratch, but finishing
up the work already done. I can work with Vivek, so if a few of the others
can spend a small amount of time we could finish this up.

After that we could look at WG termination.

>
> Jerry
>
> >So, I'll go quiet unless someone has a specific issue or
> >wants to continue the debate for some other reason.  Mark me down as not

> >supporting the hum which is likely just me in this regard.
> >
> >Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPoverIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipoverib



Bernie King-Smith
IBM Corporation
Server Group
Cluster System Performance
[email protected]    (845)433-8483
Tie. 293-8483 or wombat2 on NOTES

"We are not responsible for the world we are born into, only for the world
we leave when we die.
So we have to accept what has gone before us and work to change the only
thing we can,
-- The Future." William Shatner