RE: RPR protection with MPLS

George Suwala <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:09:32 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.iporpr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Indeed successful RPR protection should not trigger MPLS protection (should have no impact on the MPLS protection).

However if RPR protection fails, MPLS should be triggered to protect. The exact method of doing it could be an IPORPR discussion topic, with timeouts being one of the options (so MPLS could be configured to ignore failures unless they persist for more than say 100ms, which would indicate a failure of the underlying RPR layer)

thanks

George
 
At 02:41 PM 11/11/2002 -0800, Nader Vijeh wrote:
>RPR is supposed to provide a protected Data Link Layer and should hide the
>operation of the DL from upper layers, including MPLS. This implies that
>MPLS should not trigger a protection event, if the RPR has recovered from
>the fault.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nitin panjwani [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:25 PM
>To: Frank Kastenholz; Glenn Parsons; [email protected]
>Subject: [IPORPR] RPR protection with MPLS
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>I am new to RPR world and probably have not great
>undrstanding of it yet.
>I was thinking how the network will work when there is
>mpls protection working over RPR network. Wouldn't
>this double protection delay the traffic and probably
>affect the throughput and speed. Is there any document
>available which talks about this and what are the
>thoughts of RPR gurus about it.
>
>Regards,
>Nitin 
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
>http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
>_______________________________________________
>IPORPR mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iporpr
>_______________________________________________
>IPORPR mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iporpr