Re: IPP Registration Request for Addition: New keywords for the "media" attribute
Christoph Päper via ipp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <[email protected]>: > So if no other changes, this would be the registration: > > Attributes (attribute syntax) > Keyword Attribute Value Reference > -------------------------------------------------------- -------------- > media (type2 keyword | name(MAX)) [RFC8011] > na_arch-e1_32x40in [HP20210302] > oe_photo-s8r_8x12in [HP20210302] > oe_photo_s12r_12x15in [HP20210302] Isn’t “S12R” 12in by 18in (2:3), while 12in by 15in (3:4) is “12R”? > oe_photo-14x18_14x18in [HP20210302] > oe_photo-16x20_16x20in [HP20210302] As already noted, this would be “16R”. > oe_photo-22x28_22x28in [HP20210302] > oe_photo-22r_22x29.5in [HP20210302] One reference gave “22R” as 20in by 29.5in, which makes no sense. > oe_photo-24x30_24x30in [HP20210302] > oe_photo_24r_24x31in [HP20210302] “24R” is elsewhere listed as 24in by 31.5in. 32in would make even more sense. > oe_photo_30r_30x40in [HP20210302] > om_photo-30x40_300x400mm [HP20210302] > om_photo-30x45_300x450mm [HP20210302] > om_photo-35x46_350x460mm [HP20210302] Is this the metric approximation of English 14x18 above? > om_photo-40x60_400x600mm [HP20210302] > om_photo-50x76_500x760mm [HP20210302] I’ve checked some photo print services, they are offering a poster size of nominal 50cm by 75cm, but not 76cm. > om_photo-60x90_600x900mm [HP20210302] > media-supported (1setOf (type2 keyword | name(MAX))) [RFC8011] > < all name values > _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp