Re: RFC: IPP Finishings 3.0 "laminating-type" value 'water-resistant'

"Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\) via ipp" <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jun 2022 02:37:01 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi Mike,

I support changing the 'silicone' keyword defined for "laminating-type" to 'water-resistant'. There is an identical keyword definition for "coating-type" and I support changing that one as well.

Cheers
Smith

/**
    Smith Kennedy
    HP Inc.
*/

> On Jun 2, 2022, at 1:50 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> All,
> 
> We had one semi-technical comment for the IPP Finishings 3.0 formal vote concerning the new 'silicone' value for the "laminating-type" member attribute.  The commenter suggested changing this to 'water-resistant' in order to better reflect the semantics of the type of lamination as well as making it neutral on which actual material is used to provide water resistance.
> 
> The consensus in today's IPP workgroup conference call was to make this change, however we also wanted to make sure that the previous 'silicone' value has not yet been deployed.
> 
> Please respond (privately, if necessary) to let us know whether you have any objections to replacing the "laminating-type" value 'silicone' with 'water-resistant'.  If we don't get an objection before June 10, 2022 then we will assume that publication of IPP Finishings 3.0 can proceed as planned.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)