Re: RFC: IPP Finishings 3.0 "laminating-type" value 'water-resistant'

Hi Smith,

Good catch - I agree with you on both attributes.

Cheers,
- Ira

*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [email protected]
<[email protected]>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:37 PM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)
via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I support changing the 'silicone' keyword defined for "laminating-type" to
> 'water-resistant'. There is an identical keyword definition for
> "coating-type" and I support changing that one as well.
>
> Cheers
> Smith
>
> /**
>     Smith Kennedy
>     HP Inc.
> */
>
> > On Jun 2, 2022, at 1:50 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Signed PGP part
> > All,
> >
> > We had one semi-technical comment for the IPP Finishings 3.0 formal vote
> concerning the new 'silicone' value for the "laminating-type" member
> attribute.  The commenter suggested changing this to 'water-resistant' in
> order to better reflect the semantics of the type of lamination as well as
> making it neutral on which actual material is used to provide water
> resistance.
> >
> > The consensus in today's IPP workgroup conference call was to make this
> change, however we also wanted to make sure that the previous 'silicone'
> value has not yet been deployed.
> >
> > Please respond (privately, if necessary) to let us know whether you have
> any objections to replacing the "laminating-type" value 'silicone' with
> 'water-resistant'.  If we don't get an objection before June 10, 2022 then
> we will assume that publication of IPP Finishings 3.0 can proceed as
> planned.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > ________________________
> > Michael Sweet
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp