Re: RFC: IPP Finishings 3.0 "laminating-type" value 'water-resistant'

Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:45:38 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Smith,

Works for me as well...


> On Jun 9, 2022, at 10:37 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I support changing the 'silicone' keyword defined for "laminating-type" to 'water-resistant'. There is an identical keyword definition for "coating-type" and I support changing that one as well.
> 
> Cheers
> Smith
> 
> /**
>    Smith Kennedy
>    HP Inc.
> */
> 
>> On Jun 2, 2022, at 1:50 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Signed PGP part
>> All,
>> 
>> We had one semi-technical comment for the IPP Finishings 3.0 formal vote concerning the new 'silicone' value for the "laminating-type" member attribute.  The commenter suggested changing this to 'water-resistant' in order to better reflect the semantics of the type of lamination as well as making it neutral on which actual material is used to provide water resistance.
>> 
>> The consensus in today's IPP workgroup conference call was to make this change, however we also wanted to make sure that the previous 'silicone' value has not yet been deployed.
>> 
>> Please respond (privately, if necessary) to let us know whether you have any objections to replacing the "laminating-type" value 'silicone' with 'water-resistant'.  If we don't get an objection before June 10, 2022 then we will assume that publication of IPP Finishings 3.0 can proceed as planned.
>> 
>> Thank you!
>> 
>> ________________________
>> Michael Sweet
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)