Re: Google has reviewed IPP Production Printing Extensions v2.0 and has comments
"Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\) via ipp" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the feedback, Benjamin! I appreciate your careful reading. Cheers, Smith --- Smith Kennedy [email protected] On Nov 4, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Benjamin Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: CAUTION: External Email Page 16 step 2 says the printer MUST implement a deprecated attribute (presentation-direction-number-up). If there's a replacement, should that be mentioned here and/or 5.2.16? If there's not a replacement and the printer is required to implement it, is this really deprecated? Page 26 line 649: Double period after "ignore the request" Page 26 5.2.5.2<http://5.2.5.2> and 5.2.5.3<http://5.2.5.3> media and media-col are both listed as required but are also mutually exclusive. Should they have language saying "media is CONDITIONALLY REQUIRED if media-col is not supplied" and vice versa? Page 27 5.2.6.2<http://5.2.6.2> and 5.2.6.3<http://5.2.6.3> media and media-col are both listed as required but are also mutually exclusive. Page 29 5.2.9.3<http://5.2.9.3> and 5.2.9.4<http://5.2.9.4> media and media-col are both listed as required but are also mutually exclusive. Page 31 5.2.16 presentation-direction-number-up is deprecated, but there is no indication of what clients should use instead. Page 34 5.2.17.2<http://5.2.17.2> and 5.2.17.3<http://5.2.17.3> media and media-col are both listed as required but are also mutually exclusive. Thanks, Benjamin _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list [email protected] https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp