Re: Google has reviewed IPP Production Printing Extensions v2.0 and has comments

Michael Sweet via ipp <[email protected]> Sat, 5 Nov 2022 07:11:08 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipp
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Benjamin,

Thanks for the review and comments!  We'll go over these and the other comments at the F2F...


> On Nov 4, 2022, at 5:29 PM, Benjamin Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Page 16 step 2 says the printer MUST implement a deprecated attribute
> (presentation-direction-number-up).  If there's a replacement, should
> that be mentioned here and/or 5.2.16?  If there's not a replacement
> and the printer is required to implement it, is this really
> deprecated?
> 
> Page 26 line 649: Double period after "ignore the request"
> 
> Page 26 5.2.5.2 and 5.2.5.3: media and media-col are both listed as
> required but are also mutually exclusive.  Should they have language
> saying "media is CONDITIONALLY REQUIRED if media-col is not supplied"
> and vice versa?
> 
> Page 27 5.2.6.2 and 5.2.6.3 media and media-col are both listed as
> required but are also mutually exclusive.
> 
> Page 29 5.2.9.3 and 5.2.9.4 media and media-col are both listed as
> required but are also mutually exclusive.
> 
> Page 31 5.2.16 presentation-direction-number-up is deprecated, but
> there is no indication of what clients should use instead.
> 
> Page 34 5.2.17.2 and 5.2.17.3 media and media-col are both listed as
> required but are also mutually exclusive.
> 
> Thanks,
> Benjamin
> 

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)