Re: AD review of draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-02

On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:28, Lars Eggert wrote:
>   Finally - why is this going for Informational and not PS? PS seems
>   appropriate.

To be precise, I saw David's note on this from the document writeup  
("This document is being published as Informational because RFC 3720  
indicates that this class of key specification should be published as  
informational.")

It's unfortunate that 3720 doesn't also allow publication at  
Standards Track; I wonder what the rationale for this was.  
Intuitively, this should be OK, because Standards Track publication  
has a higher bar.

If the WG decides to go for Informational because of 3720, I'm OK  
with it. It may make sense to add a short note to the introduction  
explaining this.

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips