Errata reported for RFC4171
Lars Eggert <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:16:21 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
the following errata has been reported for an RFC that originated with
this WG [*]. The transport ADs are soliciting comments on (1)
classifying and (2) verifying the errata below.
(1) The errata below should have a classification suggested by the
submitter, which will either be "technical" or editorial. We're
interested to hear comments on whether the current classification is
accurate.
(2) We're interested to hear comments on whether the errata addresses
a valid technical or editorial issue with the published RFC, i.e.,
whether the errata should be rejected or accepted as verified.
Thanks,
Lars
[*] For WGs that have concluded but whose mailing list is still
active, I'm assuming that some of the relevant experts will hopefully
still be subscribed
RFC4171, "Internet Storage Name Service (iSNS)", September 2005
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Reported By: Hannes Reinecke
Date Reported: 2006-06-23
Report Text:
Section 4.1.1 refers to 'iSCSI Node Certificate', which is never
defined in the document.
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips