Errata reported for RFC4173
Lars Eggert <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:19:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
the following errata has been reported for an RFC that originated with
this WG [*]. The transport ADs are soliciting comments on (1)
classifying and (2) verifying the errata below.
(1) The errata below should have a classification suggested by the
submitter, which will either be "technical" or editorial. We're
interested to hear comments on whether the current classification is
accurate.
(2) We're interested to hear comments on whether the errata addresses
a valid technical or editorial issue with the published RFC, i.e.,
whether the errata should be rejected or accepted as verified.
Thanks,
Lars
[*] For WGs that have concluded but whose mailing list is still
active, I'm assuming that some of the relevant experts will hopefully
still be subscribed
RFC4173, "Bootstrapping Clients using the Internet Small Computer
System Interface (iSCSI) Protocol", September 2005
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-10-17
Report Text:
Two normative references have been obsoleted:
RFC 2396 ( Ref. "[Lee98]" )
and
RFC 2732 ( Ref. "[Hinden99]" )
have both been obsoleted by RFC 3986 == STD 66 (published in January
2005) !
Affected pieces of RFC 4173:
- Both Ref's appear once (and together) near the bottom of page 4 (in
the 6th-to-last line).
- Normative References section, bottom of page 9 + top of page 10
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips