Re: Structure of tel: URI

Thanks for the comment

>I'm not sure what draft you're referring to. draft-antti-rfc2806bis-05
>has the following definition; I agree that 1*phonedigit could be 
>replaced by a term. Do you see any particular reason for doing so?


I was looking at the draft-antti-rfc2806bis-04, but after a short comparation it has no difference concerning the definition of global-number-part and local-number-part.

The reason why I asked it was my confusion about how to reference the number itself. The application of this reference was the interworking between the CalledPartyNumber parameter in ISUP and the subscriber component of tel: URI.
The mapping I got for the number information itself was: 

Address Signal = 1*phonedigit

This seemed to me somehow confusing as the number information has only the definition of format but not a name.

Btw the "+" sign could be named somehow as well so it would give the reference to distinguish the international and the national number formats.

Greetings,
Denis Alexeitsev