Re: Structure of tel: URI

I will remove local-number-part, which is also 1*phonedigit, and just
call it phone-number. I don't see the need to label "+" - you can just 
as well refer to it literally.

Alexeitsev, D wrote:
 > Thanks for the comment
 >
 >
 >> I'm not sure what draft you're referring to.
 >> draft-antti-rfc2806bis-05 has the following definition; I agree
 >> that 1*phonedigit could be replaced by a term. Do you see any
 >> particular reason for doing so?
 >
 >
 >
 > I was looking at the draft-antti-rfc2806bis-04, but after a short
 > comparation it has no difference concerning the definition of
 > global-number-part and local-number-part.
 >
 > The reason why I asked it was my confusion about how to reference the
 > number itself. The application of this reference was the interworking
 > between the CalledPartyNumber parameter in ISUP and the subscriber
 > component of tel: URI. The mapping I got for the number information
 > itself was:
 >
 > Address Signal = 1*phonedigit
 >
 > This seemed to me somehow confusing as the number information has
 > only the definition of format but not a name.
 >
 > Btw the "+" sign could be named somehow as well so it would give the
 > reference to distinguish the international and the national number
 > formats.
 >
 > Greetings, Denis Alexeitsev
 >