Re: New name for TRIP-GW

Should we take this as the consensus then ? I would like to incorporate 
this name change ASAP in the latest draft which is progress as I write.

Thanks,
Rajneesh ( for the  draft's authors )

At 11:24 PM 9/16/2002, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>OK, lets go with "Telephony Gateway Registration Protocol". Trunking is 
>too specific.
>
>The most important thing here, of course, is the statement that this is 
>not TRIP; that it uses a different back end processing (not the decision 
>process outlined in RFC 3219), but rather this consolidation process.
>
>-Jonathan R.
>
>Jayasimha M.R wrote:
>>Hi Jonathan,
>>I agree with Dhaval, TGREP sounds good. As i said earlier,
>>I propose to call this as:
>>"Trunking Gateway REgistration Protocol" instead of
>>"Telephony Gateway REgistration Protocol".
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Jayasimha
>>Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>I'd like to propose a name change for the TRIP-GW (aka TRIP-LITE) protocol.
>>>
>>>The reason is, as written, TRIP-GW is not actually an extension to TRIP. 
>>>Nor is it a subset of TRIP. It differs in the consolidation process 
>>>defined in the spec. This process, which allows an LS to keep multiple 
>>>routes to the same prefix, for example, is not compatible with the 
>>>decision process of TRIP. Its complementary, to be certain, but thats 
>>>not the same. If you took a normal TRIP LS and put it in front of a 
>>>TRIP-GW gateway, it would probably not do the right thing. It would 
>>>function, I think, but you would not be able to implement the 
>>>appropriate policies to process the information being generated by the 
>>>gateways.
>>>
>>>Do people concur with this view?
>>>
>>>If so, I would propose that we rename the protocol to the Gateway 
>>>Registration Protocol (GREP). I think the acronym is neat; the protocol 
>>>is used to search for a gateway, sort of, so grep (in the unix sense) 
>>>kind of works.
>>>
>>>The protocol syntax and semantics remain unchanged. We will simply 
>>>indicate that large pieces of TRIP are used wholesale by this protocol, 
>>>referring the user to the appropriate sections of the TRIP spec.
>>>
>>>Thoughts?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Jonathan R.
>>
>
>--
>Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
>Chief Scientist                             First Floor
>dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
>[email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
>http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
>http://www.dynamicsoft.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>IPTEL mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/iptel