Re: New name for TRIP-GW

Yes. Please include this change in the next rev.

-Jonathan R.

Rajneesh Kumar wrote:
> Should we take this as the consensus then ? I would like to incorporate 
> this name change ASAP in the latest draft which is progress as I write.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rajneesh ( for the  draft's authors )
> 
> At 11:24 PM 9/16/2002, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> 
>> OK, lets go with "Telephony Gateway Registration Protocol". Trunking 
>> is too specific.
>>
>> The most important thing here, of course, is the statement that this 
>> is not TRIP; that it uses a different back end processing (not the 
>> decision process outlined in RFC 3219), but rather this consolidation 
>> process.
>>
>> -Jonathan R.
>>
>> Jayasimha M.R wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jonathan,
>>> I agree with Dhaval, TGREP sounds good. As i said earlier,
>>> I propose to call this as:
>>> "Trunking Gateway REgistration Protocol" instead of
>>> "Telephony Gateway REgistration Protocol".
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jayasimha
>>> Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose a name change for the TRIP-GW (aka TRIP-LITE) 
>>>> protocol.
>>>>
>>>> The reason is, as written, TRIP-GW is not actually an extension to 
>>>> TRIP. Nor is it a subset of TRIP. It differs in the consolidation 
>>>> process defined in the spec. This process, which allows an LS to 
>>>> keep multiple routes to the same prefix, for example, is not 
>>>> compatible with the decision process of TRIP. Its complementary, to 
>>>> be certain, but thats not the same. If you took a normal TRIP LS and 
>>>> put it in front of a TRIP-GW gateway, it would probably not do the 
>>>> right thing. It would function, I think, but you would not be able 
>>>> to implement the appropriate policies to process the information 
>>>> being generated by the gateways.
>>>>
>>>> Do people concur with this view?
>>>>
>>>> If so, I would propose that we rename the protocol to the Gateway 
>>>> Registration Protocol (GREP). I think the acronym is neat; the 
>>>> protocol is used to search for a gateway, sort of, so grep (in the 
>>>> unix sense) kind of works.
>>>>
>>>> The protocol syntax and semantics remain unchanged. We will simply 
>>>> indicate that large pieces of TRIP are used wholesale by this 
>>>> protocol, referring the user to the appropriate sections of the TRIP 
>>>> spec.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jonathan R.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
>> Chief Scientist                             First Floor
>> dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
>> [email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
>> http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
>> http://www.dynamicsoft.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPTEL mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.bell-labs.com/mailman/listinfo/iptel
> 
> 

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com