Re: TLV conflict

Hi Harish,

Please take a look at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-242
where it is clear that draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd has an early
temporary registration for type 23.

draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-02 should be updated to clearly state
the IANA allocations that have already happened.

draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13 MUST be updated to clearly
state the IANA allocations
that have already happened for it (e.g. values 2 & 19) and to STOP
SQUATTING on already allocated
code-points.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention!

Regards,
Alia


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Harish R Prabhu <[email protected]>
wrote:

> While going through the I-Ds pertaining to SR attributes, it was found
> that the following 2 TLVs have been assigned the same Type number
>
> SRMS Preference Sub-TLV :
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-
> routing-extensions-13#section-3.4
>
> Node MSD Advertisement :
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-02#page-4
>
>  Both these sections talk about different sub tlvs under
> router_capabilities TLV, but type value assigned is 23 for both.
>
> Request to address this.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Harish R Prabhu
> Bangalore, India.
> mailtp:[email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg