Re: TLV conflict

Folks –


The conflict for SRMS Preference sub-TLV in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13#section-3.4 has already been noted and has been eliminated in the new version of the IS-IS SR draft which I expect to publish tomorrow. Note that although the IS-IS SR draft was given early allocation of some code points, a couple more sub-TLVs have been defined since then and these values have not yet been assigned by IANA. SRMS preference was one of them – though at the time of the writing of the version which added this the early allocation for MSD had not yet happened.

Alia - I believe the MSD draft already is using the code points which have been assigned by early allocation – so I do not know what further update you believe is required in that document.
???

   Les


From: Isis-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alia Atlas
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:01 AM
To: Harish R Prabhu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] TLV conflict

Hi Harish,

Please take a look at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-242
where it is clear that draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd has an early temporary registration for type 23.

draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-02 should be updated to clearly state the IANA allocations that have already happened.

draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13 MUST be updated to clearly state the IANA allocations
that have already happened for it (e.g. values 2 & 19) and to STOP SQUATTING on already allocated
code-points.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention!

Regards,
Alia


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Harish R Prabhu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
While going through the I-Ds pertaining to SR attributes, it was found
that the following 2 TLVs have been assigned the same Type number

SRMS Preference Sub-TLV :
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-13#section-3.4

Node MSD Advertisement :
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-02#page-4

 Both these sections talk about different sub tlvs under
router_capabilities TLV, but type value assigned is 23 for both.

Request to address this.

Thanks,
--
Harish R Prabhu
Bangalore, India.
mailtp:[email protected]<mailto:mailtp%[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg