Re: AD review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [section 1-4]
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Feb 2005 22:08:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Shoichi" == Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> writes: Shoichi> the same SA that IKEv1 do so. Shoichi> note that i am supposing Shoichi> that KINK complies to 2401 at the first step. if we Shoichi> choice 2401bis, my saying is wrong. I'm confused why 2401/2401bis matters for this.