Re: AD review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [section 1-4]
Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:51:46 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >>>>> "Shoichi" == Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> writes: > > Shoichi> the same SA that IKEv1 do so. > > Shoichi> note that i am supposing > Shoichi> that KINK complies to 2401 at the first step. if we > Shoichi> choice 2401bis, my saying is wrong. > I'm confused why 2401/2401bis matters for this. i should say that i did not consider 2401bis manner. if we choice 2401bis, then there might be difference between them or no.