Re: KINK issue list rev.2
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:32:22 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes: Michael> So I'm rather ambivalent. The current phrasing will Michael> certainly do it's main job: stopping a receiver from Michael> incorrectly parsing future versions and the potential Michael> exploits that could result. Maybe we really should leave Michael> it at that if for no other reason from a security/system Michael> analysis standpoint. If you want to leave it please at least say that the receiver must send back the appropriate bad version error.