Re: KINK issue list rev.2

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 12:32, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>     Michael> So I'm rather ambivalent. The current phrasing will
>     Michael> certainly do it's main job: stopping a receiver from
>     Michael> incorrectly parsing future versions and the potential
>     Michael> exploits that could result.  Maybe we really should leave
>     Michael> it at that if for no other reason from a security/system
>     Michael> analysis standpoint.
> 
> If you want to leave it please at least say that the receiver must
> send back the appropriate bad version error.

Well, I'm actually asking what others want here. I sort
of tend toward this, but it's not just my call here...

		Mike

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUAQgE7hLMsDAj/Eq++AQIMUAQAp0ioRCcYpwByAoBAUg5ipGx4svsksx0L
hqzpWQW+xpE3IFcONVJ5I1Z+TP4A1iM6htzZjNHwd1gHmySN623vCXbR9FYCeJa3
lNr1iPtHeqsAmHdGcRJlZVArI2T29g6uBozqaQ43DK+pF9mrthIaoHXG9t7z05If
b4PVxqWnJuQ=
=PW0I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----