Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

Sam,

>
>I think the main 2401bis feature is multiple SAs between two
>destinations.  Kink actually already has this capability.  It may be
>that by changing the text slightly and removing the requirement on
>selecting which SA to use if multiple SAs exist, we can get most
>2401bis functionality.

2401 already requires support for multiple SAs between a pair of 
peers. What 2401bis adds is a requirement to support these multiple 
SAs to have identical selectors, and where we are not just replacing 
one SA with a successor.

Steve