Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 14:03, Stephen Kent wrote:
> 2401 already requires support for multiple SAs between a pair of 
> peers. What 2401bis adds is a requirement to support these multiple 
> SAs to have identical selectors, and where we are not just replacing 
> one SA with a successor.

We're somewhat far afield of KINK, but what was this
for? Load balancing? QoS treatment? 

		Mike

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUAQgFha7MsDAj/Eq++AQLlVQP9HmQ4vvaUwu53jlFUTb2N0gOXpglKvPQI
DfZ8rK31lADa3X1qCdPT5qZsIdBVj+5GOU17ImR/1Xzr6RP7PXko2Km/SdY4S33Z
2+FfeWUC4+hKNgR082Ub6h7Um4hY+gYAStn0r1deylkKH3oqr9iWkVSyqibG2vRt
KZMvyCJdpt0=
=+y3X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----