Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

At 3:25 PM -0800 2/2/05, Michael Thomas wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 14:03, Stephen Kent wrote:
>>  2401 already requires support for multiple SAs between a pair of
>>  peers. What 2401bis adds is a requirement to support these multiple
>>  SAs to have identical selectors, and where we are not just replacing
>>  one SA with a successor.
>
>We're somewhat far afield of KINK, but what was this
>for? Load balancing? QoS treatment?
>
>		Mike

QoS.

Steve