Re: AD review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [section 1-4]
Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:12:32 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> [**] Discuss status message, rebooting peers and u2u. This looks a > lot like the IKE case where you lose all cryptographic context to me. When the responder reboots, and an initiator sends a CREATE with USE-SESSION-KEY to the responder, then the responder uses 1) a identical TGT like storing a flush card. 2) a different TGT from the previous, like using PK-INIT to decode the message from the initiator. #1. rebooting does not matter at the both sides. #2. the responder can not decode the message, because the responder does not have the previous session key at all. my proposal is that the responder sends back KRB_TGT_REP including its new TGT..(A). then, the initiator can proceed to the next step like GETTGT operation. The initiator MUST NOT believe that the responder rebooted by receiving the KRB_TGT_REP message.