Re: AD Review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [starting at section 5]
Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:51:09 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I went to the IANA desk yesterday. She suggested me that:
1) we have to decide which codes are the IANA matter.
2) we have to explain in the IANA consideration of the draft
2-1) which codes do we want the IANA to assign ?
We can request a specific system port number for the KINK
to the IANA although the number will not be accepted by
some reason.
2-2) which codes do we want to register into the registry ?
and which registry do we want to register ?
So, my opinion is that
#1. from the current docuemnt, the followin codes are IANA matter.
- KINK message type
- KINK payload type
- KINK error code
- KINK port number
#2. We have to register
- KINK message type
- KINK payload type
- KINK error code
I don't think it is necessary to register them into the ISAKMP
registry. so we have to request a new registry creation
such like KINK registry.
And the KINK port number has to be assigned by the IANA.
I don't think that we need a specific system port number.
so we can leave it to the IANA.
> > Section 11:
> >
> > Needs work. You may want to stop by tthe IANA office hours and ask
> > them for advice. They are generally quite good at working with
> > authors to figure out how things need to be specified.
>
> I will take the following questions, and try to contact the desk.
>
> which codes do we want ?
> which codes should we define ?
> kink port number
> kink error number
> kink payload type
>
> I am thinking that the port number should be assigned by IANA,
> and others are defined by us.
>