#42 [-] Wording
Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> Wed, 11 May 2005 17:28:58 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, all. Let's resume discussion of making our draft. >>#42 [-] Wording >>(waiting a revision) >> >> Section 4.3, discussing attributes, mixes singular and plural >> indications. If Ken indicated the following sentence; The initiator MUST check to see if the optimistic payload was selected by comparing all transforms and attributes which MUST be identical from the initiator's optimistic proposal with the lone exception of LIFE_KILOBYTES and LIFE_SECONDS. then I think that the original text in the section 4.3 is nearly correct. because a single proposal can contain multiple transforms, for example, using both ESP and AH. and regardless of that, a transform can contain multiple attributes. >> The word "lone" appears to be popular with the author, >> too. :-) (Ken Raeburn) kink payloads can logically chain infinitely. so i guess the author used the word. i propose that the section 7.3 should be placed before the section 4.3. we can reduce using the word because the seciton 7.3 explains the kink packet structure.