Re: Sufficient Energy to finish KINK--comments by 2005-01-06

Michael Thomas <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:25:16 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.kink
Organization Cisco Systems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ken'ichi-san, 

I've been very busy lately on other things and haven't
had a chance to digest Sam's comments very well, but
some help for KINK to move it forward would be 
appreciated. If there's really interest, I'm willing
to do my part to finalize KINK.

		Mike

On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 18:17, KAMADA Ken'ichi wrote:
> [Reposting because my previous post doesn't have appeared on the list
> within 24 hours.]
> 
> At Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:57:00 -0500,
> Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm soliciting comments to determine whether there is sufficient
> > interest to finish the KINK work.
> 
> Hi, I'm much interested in KINK and implementing it for *BSD and Linux
> as a member of racoon2 project.  A prototype implementation (with
> pre-alpha quality) will be released in this year.
> 
> I think the work is still valuable (and also willing to continue to
> implement it), because I think KINK is suitable for well managed
> environments which have a lot of devices with limited computational
> power.
> 
> When this work is decided to go forward, I will commit my experiences
> in implementing KINK to revising the draft.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 307 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUAQcJRnLMsDAj/Eq++AQImBwP9GMFvw9tV7MLwP44xeaXRYH0WH5wdnMPG
BM53wf60THf/wG4wlDgYnMTtOhrBePrOcd+PLDfT13DfloPjB9aQgiu0us1xsIeZ
Op7tl78lVsVIdCi0AfCxBya2Ak+vJi+4T+AdcVVwJRQcGJgZYa4JPjw6nX7gfLF7
uzLYECcPuLM=
=W/TJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----