Re: Sufficient Energy to finish KINK--comments by 2005-01-06

FYI

Some people outside IETF are also interested in KINK.

   http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/art034.html

So I believe KINK is important for industrial area
where there are a lot of low-end devices
mentioned by Kamada-san.

Thanks,

From: "KAMADA Ken'ichi" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sufficient Energy to finish KINK--comments by 2005-01-06
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:17:50 +0900

> 
> [Reposting because my previous post doesn't have appeared on the list
> within 24 hours.]
> 
> At Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:57:00 -0500,
> Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm soliciting comments to determine whether there is sufficient
> > interest to finish the KINK work.
> 
> Hi, I'm much interested in KINK and implementing it for *BSD and Linux
> as a member of racoon2 project.  A prototype implementation (with
> pre-alpha quality) will be released in this year.
> 
> I think the work is still valuable (and also willing to continue to
> implement it), because I think KINK is suitable for well managed
> environments which have a lot of devices with limited computational
> power.
> 
> When this work is decided to go forward, I will commit my experiences
> in implementing KINK to revising the draft.

----- nobuo