Re: AD review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [section 1-4]
Nobuo OKABE <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:07 +0900 (JST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Subject: AD review: draft-ietf-kink-kink [section 1-4] Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:31:08 -0500 > I'd recommend reading draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis, > draft-ietf-krb-wg-crypto and skimming > draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications. > > Rfc2401bis is setting before the IESG; there are some discusses > although I expect the document to be approved by IETF 62. > > The Kerberos documents have been approved and are in the RFC editor > queue. The crypto document is actually in auth48 waiting for Ken to > confirm some final edits. I agree if 2401bis is fixed soon. However, we can have another way if it is not fixed by IETF62. From implementor's viewpoint, it seems good to improve/fix the draft based upon 2401, then to write another draft based upon 2401bis because we need to fix the draft ASAP. It seems fair to me to postpone the date of fixing the milestones from February 7 to after IETF62. Because the progress of 1401bis has impact against the KINK draft. So I would like to ask chairs to have a meeting in IETF62. The deadlines (and/or basic direction like the above) seems to need face2face meeting, though detail technical discussion can be done on the ML. Official meeting might be unnecessary. # There might be a low attendance, I guess... thanks, ----- nobuo