who will edit the draft ?
Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:24:50 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
WG chairs,
I am also interested in the KINK protocol, and have a experience
to discuss the specification, to implement it in our team. And I
am developping a IKE daemon in the KAME project. So I can be reviewer
from the KINK and IPsec point of view.
There are some comments about the draft in the mailing list.
Who will collect these comments and will edit the draft ?
If no one did or will do that, our team is ready to gather them
and will edit the draft.
There are some people interested in the protocol. I think that we
should have a meeting in order to manage the KINK WG. I am not sure
that "manage" is suitable word. To complete the KINK specification may
be suitable. We have two items at least. One is to make a consensus
the modification of current draft. Second is to discuss how to
manage the WG. I dont mind that the scale of the meeting is
a WG meeting, a BoF, a closed meeting or a lunch meeting.
I want to know who will join the meeting. Of course I will.
And we have to make a milestone ASAP. Here is from "Goals and Milestones"
in the WG page,
Done Reach Consensus on requirements document
Done Meet at San Diego IETF to review drafts
Jan 01 Reach Consensus on base draft protocol
Feb 01 Conduct WG last call on base draft prototol
Mar 01 Begin Interoperability bakeoffs
Aug 01 Document interoperability results.
Make decision to recycle or move forward
The items would be:
Feb 14 Submit draft kink-07 with editorial modifications.
Mar 01 Review the issue of current draft, kink-06.
Apr 01 Reach Consensus on draft.
May 01 Resubmit revised draft as Proposed Standard.
Aug 01 Begin Interoperability bakeoffs.
Sep 01 Document interoperability results.
If the chair has had the set already, I am sorry for my meddling,
but at least I have not seen yet. Thease are just my opinion,
any comment welcome. That would be help for the chairs.