Re: who will edit the draft ?

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Derek Atkins wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > I'm still willing to edit the draft if we're not
> > talking about wholesale changes, and we're talking
> > about a relatively modest amount of time (eg, a 
> > few months). 
> 
> I hope it'll only take a few months, but I know Sam is going to be a
> stickler for quality before the IESG.  This isn't a bad thing, but I
> think it's going to put a lot more scrutiny on the document, so it may
> be significantly more work than you expect at the moment.  It's hard
> to say right now.
> 
> At the face of it we need to update the document to meet the new
> format requirements, update to krb-clarifications and krb-crypto, and
> probably update to reference IKEv2 and 2401bis.  I dont know what
> other changes are going to be required.
> 

I think I missed something: Why do we need to update to reference ikev2? The
ikev1 phase 2 exchange works just fine.

jan


> So, if you're willing (and able) to put in the time and effort to
> remain the editor I'm happy to keep you.  However if you feel that you
> cannot commit to the task I'd ask that we find someone else.  I leave
> that choice up to you for now.
> 
> > Has a decision been made on wg meeting in MPLS?
> > I'm hoping that the issues don't require a f2f 
> > meeting, but it would be good to know one way or
> > the other.
> 
> I'm willing to go either way.  If the WG believes we need a face to
> face meeting then I'll gladly arrange for one.
> 
> > 		Mike
> 
> -derek
> 
> -- 
>        Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
>        [email protected]             www.ihtfp.com
>        Computer and Internet Security Consultant
>