Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-02.txt
Sam Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: Simon> Tom Yu <[email protected]> writes: >> Changes since -01: >> >> Deprecate "export strength" RC4-HMAC-EXP. This requires a >> normative downref to RFC 4757 (though a trivial one because its >> purpose is to deprecate part of the downref). Simon> To me, deprecating RC4-HMAC-EXP but not RC4-HMAC implies that Simon> we regard non-export strength RC4-HMAC as secure. I think Simon> this is unfortunate. I do regard rc4-hmac as reasonably secure. Am I missing something? I do not support discouraging the use of rc4-hmac for the reasons Russ cites. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg