Re: kerberos-referrals-13 - text clarification needed
Sam Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Zhanna" == Zhanna Tsitkova <[email protected]> writes: Zhanna> Hi, The beginning of the section 4.1 reads: "Two realms Zhanna> participate in any cross-realm relationship: an issuing Zhanna> realm issues a cross-realm ticket and a consuming realm uses Zhanna> this ticket. There is a degree of trust of the issuing Zhanna> realm by the consuming realm implicit in this relationship." Zhanna> Would it be possible to clarify the last sentence? The intent was that the entire rest of the section served to clarify the summary given in the first paragraph. Zhanna> Then, later in this section "Creating a cross-realm Zhanna> relationship implies relatively little inherent trust in the Zhanna> issuing realm. Significant trust only applies as principals Zhanna> dependent on that issuing realm are given access to Zhanna> resources. However, two deployment constraints may imply Zhanna> significantly greater trust is implied by the initial Zhanna> cross-realm relationship." - the last sentence needs clearer Zhanna> wording, I think. Could you try to explain what is unclear about it or propose an alternate wording? I've worked with the text enough that it's hard for me to tell any more what's hard to understand and what needs additional clarification. Zhanna> In section 3 "The client should expect, when sending names Zhanna> with the "canonicalize" KDC option, that names in the KDC's Zhanna> reply MAY be different than the name in the request." I Zhanna> suggest to have "MAY be different than the names in the Zhanna> request". This is a good catch; thanks. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg