Re: des-die-die-die and adding IANA registry status columns

On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Tom Yu wrote:

> IANA has asked whether we want to add status columns to the Kerberos
> enctype and checksumtype registries, given that we are deprecating
> some of them, so that we can use those columns to mark the algorithms
> as "deprecated".  IANA also notes that we have existing preauth
> registry entries with comments such as "obsoleted" and "deprecated"
> (though these don't have their own column either).
> 
> Any strong opinions about whether to add such status columns?
> 
> Relatedly, there is a "checksum size" column in the checksum registry
> that has some incorrect values (e.g. for the hmac-sha1-96 checksums).
> Does it make more sense to correct these values, or to drop the column
> from the registry completely?

Assuming we can keep the values correct, it seems like a nice piece of reference information to provide.  Actually that applies to the status info as well.

------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
[email protected], or [email protected]

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg