Re: des-die-die-die and adding IANA registry status columns
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:43:14 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<hat role="individual"> I'm generally against adding work at the end of a document. I don't think the deprecated entries for preauth seem like a good argument for deprecated entries for enctypes and checksum types. One concern I have is that if we're going to add status columns we should go update it for everything which is kind of beyond the scope of this document. I don't like expanding the scope of a document in IETF last call. However my opinion here is relatively weak. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg