Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model

On 05/06/12 13:08, Leif Johansson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>> To me this reads that, first the schemas will not have direct
> Correct. Direct interoperability between (say) XML schema and
> LDAP schema is not a useful goal. The fact that they represent
> the same underlying model is.
>
> Does that clarify things?
>
> 	Cheers Leif
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk/N9tUACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZneLbwCgsX+Zi9/noL1o3Q/1hhpOVhBh
> eN8An17oppZSQn6lzfhmfSyqR4EJMkRw
> =s/FA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thank you for the confirmation.
Question: In the light of this, why does the ID aim for Standards Track 
(and not for Informational)?

Best regards, Tobias

_______________________________________________
apps-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss