Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model

Leif Johansson <[email protected]> Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:37:11 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/05/2012 02:29 PM, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
> On 05/06/12 13:08, Leif Johansson wrote:
> 
>>>> To me this reads that, first the schemas will not have
>>>> direct
> Correct. Direct interoperability between (say) XML schema and LDAP
> schema is not a useful goal. The fact that they represent the same
> underlying model is.
> 
> Does that clarify things?
> 
> Cheers Leif Thank you for the confirmation. Question: In the light
> of this, why does the ID aim for Standards Track (and not for
> Informational)?

Because a standards-track LDAP schema (say) may need to _implement_
this information-model.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/N/XYACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfjRwCfQ3ZzjxtOGed0zsuauuYREwvX
2aMAn1Ose8xTl4bCahoXJOoDzE8xC355
=NTYv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----