Re: AppsDir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:37:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2012 02:29 PM, Tobias Gondrom wrote: > On 05/06/12 13:08, Leif Johansson wrote: > >>>> To me this reads that, first the schemas will not have >>>> direct > Correct. Direct interoperability between (say) XML schema and LDAP > schema is not a useful goal. The fact that they represent the same > underlying model is. > > Does that clarify things? > > Cheers Leif Thank you for the confirmation. Question: In the light > of this, why does the ID aim for Standards Track (and not for > Informational)? Because a standards-track LDAP schema (say) may need to _implement_ this information-model. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/N/XYACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfjRwCfQ3ZzjxtOGed0zsuauuYREwvX 2aMAn1Ose8xTl4bCahoXJOoDzE8xC355 =NTYv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----