Re: KDC model and atomicity

Leif Johansson <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:52:51 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/24/2012 08:35 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> What's wrong with Jeff's proposal?

The lack of a clearly formulated change proposal for which there
is clear consensus.

I'm not saying we can't get to consensus on this point!

I'm saying we're not there yet and I couldn't see that Jeffs
proposal had much more support than any of the other ideas that
have been floated in this tread.

	Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/oQwMACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZne85gCgmUIDQzz9SYTH1IOs2txs5r/+
/JkAn3bbh0kLQimGq5oMxrSgF3dhTah+
=8SM3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg