Re: KDC model and atomicity

>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Williams <[email protected]> writes:

    Nico> What's wrong with Jeff's proposal?
    Nico> _______________________________________________


With my chair hat on, I don't think we have consensus.
I think I see you and Jeff supporting; myself with concerns and don't
think I've seen any other comments expressing support or lack.

With my individual hat on, I'm concerned because it does not promote
interoperability.
Jeff proposes to have  about as many standardized attributes as there
are likely to be implementations in an ideal world, all of them
optional.
How likely are people to implement enough of the various options that we
get value from standardization?
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg